Categories
Fusebox 2016

Waffles, Performance, The Body, and Space

Day two of Waffle Chats brought together four artists, Luis Garay (choreographer), Daniela Libertad (visual art), Rachel Mars (performance maker) and Anna Rispoli (filmmaker and one third of art collective Zimmerfrei). Moderator Leslie Moody Castro quickly picked out themes that all four approach in their respective practices, she also prodded Luis into sharing personal stories from his childhood. All four artists are investigating limits in related but different ways. Libertad is conceptualizing the limits of form via the triangle, simplifying the study so much that it becomes infinitely complex. Her residency at MoHA has just begun, but already there are collections of clean lines and geometric questions lining and intersecting on the white walls tucked behind the stage.

Mars’ work seems to be pushing, pulling and testing a multitude of limits; the line between comedy and theater, emotional potential and the ability to discipline oneself properly, humor and despair. Last night at Our Carnal Hearts I found myself chuckling at the same moments that I wanted to go draw a bath and turn out the lights because I was ashamed of how much I related to her enraged envy.

Luis Garay admitted a similar feeling to me in the car after the waffle chat. He is one of those totally brilliant people that can come to a talk hung over and nervous but still spit out some mind melting metaphysical ideas about ritual, religiosity and running away.  His work Maneries  shows Sunday. Stay tuned for an interview with The Walker that I overheard him give, or just catch him in person to find out how this work is inspired by French philosopher Giorgio Agamben.

As for Anna Rispoli, I need to write a whole separate post about the limits of utopian living and the connection between her film Hometown Mutonia and the magical east Austin venue that it screened at tonight.

https://soundcloud.com/jeremy-m-barker/fusebox-waffle-chat-7april2016

Categories
Fusebox 2016

Day 1 of Fusebox: Interpretation

Every song I've ever written: band night #fusebox2016

A photo posted by Jeremy M. Barker (@moptop745) on

I’m sure I’ll have more on this later, but I was pleasantly engaged in the notion of “interpretation” by the shows I saw last night, the Royal Court’s Manwatching and Jacob Wren’s Every Song I’ve Ever Written: Band Night.

Whatever else they’re doing, both shows are explicitly playing with the materiality of interpretation of some sort of source. In Manwatching, it’s a long monologue on a woman’s sexuality that’s performed by a male comedian who’s never read it before. In Wren’s piece (the first part of a quartet) it’s the result of handing off five of his songs (songs he wrote when he was young, which–he seems to acknowledge–may only have value to him) to be performed by five different bands who then talk with him about why they chose what they did.

Leaving aside any personal feelings about how successful either enterprise was, I thought the pairing was a great way to kick off the festival as they both dealt with these issues of where “art” actually exists. While both pieces rely on a previously authored text, they both exist as a result of a distinct performance, muddying the idea of “authorship” in a provocative way.

Categories
Fusebox 2016

The Remains of “Our Carnal Hearts”

Last night at MoHA, Rachel Mars, Julie Fiore, Ann Sunder and Lori Paradoski tore down the facade: fairies, envy, a little bit of group therapy and the sweet smell of fresh group coffee. If you missed Our Carnal Hearts, you can go tonight at 7. @kmcatmull captured it perfectly. #Fusebox2016

 

Categories
Fusebox 2016

The Arts Center: A Monster That Requires a Lot of Food

The kickoff Waffle Chat at #Fusebox2016 got to the heart of things real quick. Panelists Kee Hong Low ( West Kowloon Cultural District, Hong Kong), Matthieu Goeury (Vooruit, Belgium), and Cory Baker (The Long Center, Austin) joined Ron Berry for some real talk about the state of international arts funding, the role of arts centers in local communities and future aspirations for their institutions.  Kee Hong Low, the Head of Artistic Development in Theater for the massive new Hong Kong Arts district, West Kowlhoon, jokingly referred to arts centers as monsters that require a lot of food. He was alluding to the huge amounts of investment money taken to build a center, but his analogy surpasses the financial. Arts centers constantly need to reinvest in their communities, as new Vice President of the Long Center, Cory Baker discussed with a local Austinite. The long Center offers a residency program that gives local artists access to rehearsal space, marketing and other perks, but in 2015 no one applied. This speaks volumes to the disconnect between artists and the resources at The Long Center. With the loss of several key performance venues in Austin this year, such residencies will be crucial for presenters. The question that faces Baker is how to make The Long Center feel more accessible to the local arts community. As she said, it’s not about bringing new work to Austin, but about how to engage with what’s already here.Matthieu Goeury, on the other hand, is looking ahead to a future community in Belgium that will be quite different than the current patrons of Vooruit. He is faced with an influx of young non-white immigrants that will largely reshape the demographic in Belgium. He wonders how to plan ahead for a different audience. I wonder what strategies Vooruit is using, and how those might be in conversation with the ones we are having in Austin and in other regions? How can local artists and art centers, like the the Long Center, engage with one another more effectively? How can a large scale district for the arts  be developed in a way that feels like home for locals?

This talk got me thinking and wondering. Have a listen, comment here or come find me IRL (I’m the gal with purple hair) I’d love to keep ‘chewing the fat’ together.

https://soundcloud.com/jeremy-m-barker/fusebox-waffle-chat-6-april-2016

Categories
Fusebox 2016

Fusebox Eve: Annie-B Parson and Paul Lazar

Last night at Fusebox Eve, Paul Lazar described Fusebox as “equisite for an American city” while discussing the importance of Fusebox and other festivals for the American arts community. There is something about dining together, with colleagues, artists, new faces, locals and out-of-towners, that made that importance tangible. Or as Aaron Sanders put it “holy hell you should have been there.”

Here’s to the beginning of #Fusebox2016!IMG_8956

 

Categories
Fusebox 2016

Welcome to Deeply Fascinating at Fusebox

hi everybody! I'm in Austin to cover #fusebox2016 so if you see me say hi

A photo posted by Jeremy M. Barker (@moptop745) on

It’s 77 degrees Fahrenheit and I’m sitting outside, listening to the chirping of birds and getting acculturated to Austin. Having just flown in from New York–where we enjoyed one last stab of wintry cold as spring opens up–it’s a bit of an adjustment. I’ve already received a bit of an introduction to Fusebox audiences courtesy of Tim Braun, my erstwhile editor and project organizer, but I wanted to take a minute to introduce myself and share what I hope to have happen during my time here at Fusebox 2016.

For the duration of this festival, myself, my collaborator Christine Gwillim, and the others we cajole or invite into offering their insights, experiences, and opinions, will be trying to engage in an ongoing conversation. Sometimes that conversation takes place online, either here or on social media, which we will link to from here. Sometimes it takes place IRL, in which case we’ll do our best to share it here for those who couldn’t be part of it. And then–hopefully–readers and audience members will take that and continue the conversation with us, online or IRL. If you don’t know me, feel free to reach out and we can meet in person. I’ll be as Twitter-savvy as possible for the next week, and you can follow me @jeremymbarkerNY. Christine is on Twitter @clgwillim. And in general, track #fusebox2016 to keep up.

By way of a personal introduction, I’m a contemporary performance critic based in New York. I’m passionate about dance, experimental or non-conventional theater, visual art performance, and so on–a whole host of alternative (or, in Fusebox’s preferred vocabulary, “hybrid”) performance practices that I lump under the rubric of “contemporary performance.” While I’m based in New York, which has an amazing performance scene, I don’t like to think of myself as a “New York critic.” Indeed, I’ve only lived there six years (as of yesterday, come to think of it!), having grown up in Portland and spent some seven years in Seattle. Having moved to New York at the age of 30, I never quite had the romantic experience of joining the New York art-scene; I was too old. And furthermore, having come of age outside the cultural metropole, I moved there knowing that there’s a whole wonderful world of art being made outside of New York that was every bit as deserving (and occasionally decidedly more deserving) of attention than what happens in the Downtown art world.

I first got to come to Fusebox back in 2012, when I was editor of Culturebot.org. Andy Horwitz, Culturebot’s founder and visionary, and I presented a few events as part of the supplementary programming, and got to see a lot of great art and eat a lot of great food. I look forward to the chance to do so again.

By way of closing, I wanted to share a quick anecdote that I think illustrates what I hope to help accomplish with this project on this blog. The year I moved to NYC, I took a trip home, to Portland, in September, to see my family and to cover the TBA Festival, Portland’s own Fusebox-style festival. One of the shows I caught was a dance/movement piece by Maria Hassabi, a New York-based choreographer whose work is (IMHO) remarkable. It’s also not very “dance-y” if by dance you expect musicality, lots of leaps and footwork, and so on. Her work is slowly, contemplative, beautiful, and challenging. Outside the theater, after the performance, I saw more than one couple walk away chatting, bewildered or bored. I wanted to get the chance to talk with them about their experience of something new that maybe wasn’t part of their art vocabulary. Because that’s what a festival like Fusebox is for: Being exposed to something new, and creating dialogue and expanding our vocabularies for talking about art.

One of the great blessings of my life is how much I’ve gotten to engage with this sort of work, and I love sharing it with others. I would love to have that conversation (which I couldn’t have after Maria’s show) with people here in Austin. So Tweet at me, or meet me for coffee or a drink. Tonight I’m seeing Manwatching tonight at 7 and Every Song I’ve Ever Written at 9. Around 8 I’ll be at the festival hub, where Tim Braun promises to kick my ass at bowling (a likely event). So you know where to find me.

I look forward to getting to chat soon.

Categories
Fusebox 2016

Fusebox Eve Celebration

I, alas, missed the kickoff last night (and nearly my connecting flight in Dallas-Ft. Worth), so I don’t know exactly what this means yet, but it sure makes me regret not having been there.

Categories
Fusebox 2016

Early Press for Fusebox 2016

A quick round-up of some of the preview press for Fusebox 2016.

Categories
Fusebox 2016

Prepping for #fusebox2016

The transformation has begun. @fuseboxfestival #fusebox2016

A photo posted by Salvage Vanguard Theater (@salvagevanguard) on

Ah Salvage Vanguard! Very excited to be seeing it again. Also, keep an eye out for photos on Instagram for #fusebox2016.

Categories
Fusebox 2016

Pre-flight Thoughts on Artists at Fusebox 2016

Sorry Austin...this author's from Portland.
Sorry Austin…this author’s from Portland.

One of the fun parts of my job being a critic and all is getting to follow artists over the years around the country (and to a lesser degree, the world) as they present their work and develop. Fusebox 2016 is great in that it gives me the chance to meet some artists whose work I’ve followed for years but never met, catch shows I’ve missed, or catch up with artists in Austin whose work I wish I had the chance to see more often. Based on all that, here’s a quick break-down of thoughts and impressions on the artists showing in 2016, based on a non-exhaustive review of the artists and my own prior coverage of them.

deborah-2Deborah Pearson. I am absolutely stoked to finally meet Pearson IRL. A theater artist of no small accomplishment herself, I really first became aware of her work as one of the organizers of the Forest Fringe, a programming series of experimental contemporary performance that emerged under Pearson’s direction in 2007, and quickly became one of the most exciting parts of the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. Forest Fringe has toured shows internationally–including to Fusebox in 2013, and New York in 2014, when I interviewed Andy Field, Pearson’s collaborator and co-curator. But Pearson I never met nor spoke to, our only communication having been back in 2011 when she wrote an essay for Exeunt on narrative, its uses and the traps it catches artists in. Isaac Butler here in the US took issue with some of her arguments, which I endorsed, and anyway we emailed a few times on the topic. Her show this year at Fusebox, Like You Were Before, is a reprise of her first solo piece, an exploration of her experience leaving Canada. You’ve only got one chance to see it, though: Thursday, April 7 at 5 p.m. Also be sure to check out Fusebox’s artist profile on her.

My Barbarian. Formerly LA (now New York) based, I first caught this visual art performance group at the Whitney Biennial in 2014. Their practice as art makers is a fascinating example of how different arts ecologies, funding structures, and critical discourses influence the work. Having emerged from various experimental performance fields, the company began exploring theatrical forms as a sort of material for visual art exploration. At least that’s how I first encountered them, doing a Brechtian production of Brecht’s The Mother, the didacticism of which became the subject of their exploration of political engagement. It was re-presented a couple months later in New York as part of the 2015 American Realness festival, where I interviewed one part of the trio, Alexandro Segade. Anyway, I had always wanted to see their experiments in Post-Living Ante Action Theater (PoLAAT), which Fusebox is presenting this year. More on the Austin project here, also I recommend checking out the BOMB interview they did a few years ago, and finally Andy Horwitz’s ever-popular essay on the white cube vs. black box.

Big Dance Theater. When I first moved to New York, I made the pilgrimage to see as many of the “big” downtown performance companies and artists as quickly as I could, the ones from which so many other artist genealogies trace. The Wooster Group. Richard Foreman. Anne Bogart/SITI Company. Mac Wellman. Of all of them, to be quite bluntly honest, it was Big Dance–the 25-year-old dance theater company co-founded by Annie-B Parson and Paul Lazar–that most decided didn’t disappoint. Quite the opposite, of all those groups (whose work has certainly amazed and informed me), it’s Big Dance that’s always been the most consistently and remarkably creative, from the first show I saw–from Supernatural Wife way back in 2011, through the Sibyl Kempson-penned brilliance of Ich Kürbisgeist, the bizarre genius of Allan Smithee Directed This Play and now Short Form, a collection of short choreographies by Parson. Not to be missed.