Categories
Blogging Life

January Ticket Price Madness

Like many people I know, the last few weeks have been a matter of spending fairly large amounts of money on tickets to shows in January for Under the Radar, COIL, American Realness, and so on. Or, well, let me clarify: Under the Radar. As a critic I tend to have the opportunity to receive review comps. But for various reasons I usually wind up buying my own tickets to Under the Radar shows. Which makes me one of the lucky ones, to be sure–the cost would be staggering otherwise. Anyway, a Facebook friend threw this up this morning and it cracked me up:

10885091_10204745954261401_3418682756210247281_n

As he pointed out, $25 for a 15-minute performance works out to a little over $1.66 per minute of performance. Which, for some reason, does seem expensive. $25 for a downtown performance is a little higher than average I want to say, but still solidly within the expected price range. But for only 15 minutes? It’s an odd bit of math to do: what is the value of a minute of performance?

The economics of production dictate that the fixed costs (design, set construction, load-in, etc.) are more or less the same for a show regardless of whether its run time is five minutes or 5 hours. If I were James Surowiecki writing in The New Yorker‘s financial page, I’m sure I’d have some pithy little analysis based in social science research that would provide a concrete language regarding why it is that–even though I know why the prices are the same for a short performance or a long one–that it seems somehow unfair to have to pay the same for a show that’s short as for one that’s long. Instead, I just decided to start running the math on various shows based on ticket prices I’ve paid (or would have paid had I been forced to buy them):

  • Nature Theater’s Life and Times Episode 1-4 at UTR/Soho Rep ’13: $0.16 per minute (at $25 per ticket/4 tickets, over 10 hours)
  • Einstein on the Beach, BAM ’12: $0.29 per minute (at $80 per ticket, over 4 1/2 hours)
  • Daniel Fish’s A (radically condensed and expanded) Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again (after David Foster Wallace) at the Chocolate Factory ’12: $0.13 per minute (at $20 a ticket, over 2 1/2 hours–which is a full hour longer than the reduced version being shown as part of Under the Radar ’15)
  • 600 Highwaymen’s The Record at the Invisible Dog ’13: $0.26 per minute ($15 suggested donation at nearly exactly 57 minutes–if Abby or Michael feel so inclined, they can provide exact run-time for the most accurate cost-per-minute analysis here)
  • TR Warszawa’s 4.48 Psychosis at St. Ann’s Warehouse ’14: $0.75 per minute ($45 per ticket, 60-minute run-time)
  • Philippe Quesne’s Bivouac at Performa 13: $1.50 a minute? Maybe? ($20 for a 30-minute…90-minute… Wait, if the bus ride was part of the performance, do I have to figure out how long it was supposed to take if the driver hadn’t gotten lost? And do I subtract the period during which the performance was interrupted to make us all stage a scene for a different performance Quesne was making? Fucking performance art…)
  • Jim Findlay’s Dream of the Red Chamber in Times Square ’14: $0.00 per minute ($0.00 ticket for up to 12 hours; at zero cost it’s not worth debating the validity of whether you experience performance while you’re asleep for the purposes of calculation)
  • Fernando Rubio’s Everything by my side at Crossing the Line/PS122 ’14: $0.33 ($5 for 15 minutes…though I actually think the “performance” was much less than 15 minutes)
  • Gerald Kurdian’s The Magic of Spectacular Theater at Crossing the Line ’12: $0.50 per minute, or $0.30 per minute, or $15 for nothing, depending (Assumes $15 ticket purchased in advance for the performance that  started 20 minutes after scheduled curtain due to artistic crisis, which in turn led to the artist not actually performing the intended show. So pricing is based on whether you assume the show started late but you accepted the alternate performance of a few songs; or whether you accept the artist’s statement that what took place onstage was all a matter of conscious decision, which means the show didn’t start late; or whether you assume you didn’t actually get the thing you thought you paid for at all)
  • Elevator Repair Service’s Gatz in Seattle in ’07 or NYC in 2010: $0.06 per minute, or $0.41 per minute (depends on whether you paid $24 for the show at  On the Boards in 2007 or $160 top price at the Public in 2011)
Categories
Projects

Support zoe|juniper Who Need a New Set Because FedEx

To get an idea of where I‘ve been with this, you check out this narrative more or less covering (actually, dancing around) my project with Zoe Scofield and Juniper Shuey. In 2013. Not the 2012 part, not the 2014 part. Just 2013. This is the morass I’m working way through right now–hours of interviews, hundreds of photos, pages upon pages of writings, dozens of emails. All to produce a definitive document of the making of BeginAgain, which will be returning (in mainstage form) to NYC as part of PS122’s 2015 COIL Festival, at Baryshnikov Arts Center.

And that’s just what I’ve been through. Think about the artists! All that work! Unfortunately, for all this work to come to fruition, the company needs to replace a massive, hand-made, delicate paper cut-out backdrop by Celeste Cooning. Which was literally lost in the mail. And which FedEx did not cover the cost of replacing. So let’s all help cough a little bit to let us see this amazing design the way it was meant to be seen.

Categories
Criticism

Early-Bird January Recommendations

So yes, the entire January shit-show thing is coming back and whatnot, and personally I’m still trying to wrap my head around it all. There’s tons and tons of mainstage, head-lining shows to see that are new (or largely new) to New York audiences. But for better or worse, the entire reason the entire January festival season thing is a shit-show is precisely because it’s a showcase of work from New York and around the world–for audiences from around the world. So, in the interest of serving what few readers this blog occasionally has, I thought I’d throw out some really strong pieces that should not be missed this January, based on my knowledgeable critical opinion, which may or may not be of interest to you. The list is preliminary and by no means exhaustive, but what follows is a group of artists whose work I’ve followed with engagement and interest, and I’d be remiss not calling them out.

Temporary Distortion’s My Voice Has An Echo In It (COIL Festival)

10389183_10203584621910429_1214095056162833799_n

Kenneth Collins is a relentless sort of artist. He had something good (commercially, if that’s the right word) going with his trilogy of film deconstructions: Welcome to Nowhere (on road movies), Americana Kamikaze (Japanese horror), and Newyorkland (cop films and TV shows). However, as I reported in a lengthy feature on Collins in Chance magazine earlier this year, the entire progression left him cold. From a beginning as an artist interested in arresting but largely static situations, the engagement with film tropes kept inviting in the terror of narrative, until–despite commissions and opportunities–he felt he had to turn his back on it all. A couple years of false starts and deep artistic exploration later, he and his company return with My Voice Has an Echo In It, a durational installation performance piece which takes his Minimalist-sculpture-inspired box aesthetics to new heights. It’s not to be missed.

zoe | juniper’s BeginAgain (COIL Festival)

10494647_10203712911879504_7802672891791493199_n

Similar to Temporary Distortion, my engagement with this piece began critically and journalistically. For two years, I followed the company’s development of the piece, as choreographer Zoe Scofield and designer/visual artist Juniper Shuey attempted to further the aesthetic considerations that had informed their work for years. Juniper’s design has always been beautiful and arresting, but Zoe’s choreography–to be blunt–has been divisive amongst choreographers I know. The dominance of conceptualism in contemporary dance makes Zoe’s highly technically accomplished work a little outside the mainstream as it resolutely refuses to move toward either contemporary ballet or deconstructive conceptual performance. Instead, in this piece, Zoe and Juniper attempted to design a development process that would challenge them to collapse their aesthetic concerns further, subtly shifting the site of spectacle from the dancer’s body (the balletic quality Zoe was so known for) while at the same preserving and furthering Juniper’s exploration of design/installation as a means of lyrical and fluid expression, rather than a conceptual/deconstructive environment or, worse, a “set.” Those who might be tempted to write off the company’s return to Baryshnikov as part of PS 122’s COIL–based on the fact they were here in May with the Joyce Theater (off-site at 3LD)–should be aware that the earlier New York appearance was a reconceptualized “installation/performance” considerably different from the stage version I saw opening weekend in Seattle in March. So even if (or particularly if) you caught the 3LD version, come back. It won’t disappoint.

Royal Osiris Karaoke Ensemble’s The Art of Luv (Part 1) (Under the Radar)

1391679_10153318959648136_9210660938630817785_n

Ah, the ROKE! Consistently challenging and irreverent, Royal Osiris (the brainchild of theater artist Tei Blow and visual artist Sean McElroy)  defies description. Nominally based on characters with a dramaturgically solid (if narratively irrelevant) backstory, Royal Osiris defies traditional categories, as much deconstructive performance art as immersive theater. Blow and McElroy create performances through archaeological excavations of media that ranges from relationship advice shilling to New Age spirituality shilling to…karaoke. But the “shilling” is the important part. Below what at what first blush seems a wormhole of odd-ball YouTube videos (most of which are actually too rare to appear on YouTube) is an indictment of the nightmarish way the ever-increasing prevalence of media self-help, buoyed by a surprisingly solid foundation in business management theory, warps our perceptions of love and self-worth. Also operative in the above is the statement “at first blush”–at first blush, Royal Osiris may not seem to be your thing. Give it a second blush (whatever that euphemism actually means); let them surprise you.

Tony Torn/Dan Safer/Julie Atlas Muz’s Ubu Sings Ubu (No festival, at the Slipper Room for two nights only!)

10277692_1485241401690111_7723203651646376878_n

When Ubu Sings Ubu premiered at Abrons this past April, well…I think it more or less did well, but it sort of avoided the popular (or rather, scene-y) downtown performance consciousness. For a few reasons. Despite having been a member of Reza Abdoh’s company for a series of seminal works, Torn was sort of an unknown in the contemporary. Couple that with Dan Safer, who I think sometimes suffers (unfairly) from the sense that if you’ve seen one Witness Relocation show, you’ve seen them all. And then there was the play itself–Alfred Jarry’s seminal Ubu Roi, a play everyone knows, many people did shit versions of in college, and no one can think of good production of. Oh, and the amazing Julie Atlas Muz? Ubu Sings Ubu opened less than two weeks following the closing of the surprise hit that was her turn in Beauty and the Beast. All of which is really sad, because in this piece, the artists, all bringing their distinctive voices to the production, realized the most effective and original version of Jarry’s oft-neglected text imaginable. Paired with the music of proto-punk outift Pere Ubu, Torn and Muz bring ear-bleeding ferocity to Jarry’s tale of the brutish and ignorant would-be king of Poland. Dan Safer will do some full-body wrestling as the bear. It will stink to high-heaven of kielbasa. And the video/animation design by Kaz Phillips Safer is wonderful.

Categories
Blogging Life

December-Adjacent Personal Reportage, or, Come to the Red & White Party

The author in Company I, at the Park Avenue Armory
The author in Company I, at the Park Avenue Armory

Not that I usually indulge in very personal blog posts, but today has been a rather interesting and—in a good way—emotional day. Getting up earlier than I rather would on a Sunday morning, I rushed into the city to meet friends at MoMA to see the Matisse cut-outs exhibit. Matisse is not particularly one of my favorites, but a good friend is very fond of his work, and so me and her and her husband had made plans to see it, and finding a time (it’s a ticketed exhibit) proved tricky.

While I have to admit to being touched by the Matisse exhibit, the emotional part came more through visiting MoMA with someone who’d never been there before. For someone like me, an embittered critic (or something) whose job it is to tackle some of the more thorny intersections of labor, artistic production, and art presentation, I have all manner of complicated responses to an 800-pound gorilla in the room like MoMA. But mostly what I was reminded of—wandering the fifth floor permanent collection after our time with Matisse—was how spell-binding MoMA was the first time I went there. March 1997, me on a trip with my high school drama class from Portland, Oregon. I was nearly 18 years old and the entire affair was very, very exciting. It included mostly Broadway shows—Rent with the original cast, and Something Funny Happened on the Way to the Forum with Whoopi—but on our one free day, while most of my friends either shopped for knock-offs in Chinatown or entertained themselves by wondering what it was like inside the strip-clubs that still lined Times Square that precious few of us could enter, I went off, by myself, to MoMA.

I’m not sure why, exactly, visiting today affected me so. I go at least a few times a year for one reason or another. Hell, I once did a power visit for Boris Charmatz’s Musee de la Danse: Three Collective Gestures, just to score a print of Jim Fletcher re-enacting a Vito Acconci performance (sort of) piece. Which still hangs on my wall. Anyway, today, while standing in front of Van Gogh, and glancing to my left, through the archway to where Desmoiselles d’Avignon hangs, I was rather affected by the entire experience, as much tied to the passage of time as to anything else, and have been in a weird sort of fugue ever since.

Right after I had to rush north, up to the Park Avenue Armory, where I was hosting a rehearsal by Susana Cook in the space I had to vacate immediately after in Company I on the second floor, Sister Sylvester’s home over the past four or five months. The space was courtesy of Sasha Frere-Jones (of the New Yorker and whatnot), who was the proper artist-in-residence there and on whose behalf we performed The Fall: A Performative Screening on November 12 as part of the Armory’s “Under Construction” series. Sasha opened with a passionate and intelligent plea that organizations like the Armory avail (some, at least) of their space and resources to emerging artists like us.

It was quite hard to lug that last box of materials out of the Armory (not least because it contains various BDSM-y implements, including a four-foot-long closet rack with leather neck-chokers, which attracts more than its fair share of attention on the subway). This was a sort of home-away-from-home for some time. Depositing a few spare beers I found inside one of the regimental lockers in the second-floor kitchen refrigerator, I was reminded of sitting in that kitchen desperately trying to finish a draft of a bizarre essay on Suzanne Bocanegra, Sibyl Kempson, and Big Dance Theater’s Ich, Kürbisgeist, which was just published in Chance magazine, of which I’ve become an editor. I need to pick up my copy at our Union Square offices this week. This edition also includes a photo spread of Sister Sylvester’s The Maids’ The Maids, shot by the amazing Maria Baranova (the best in the business says the editor–hire her).

Maybe my entire seasonal nostalgia trip began a few days ago, when I heard from Performance Space 122, asking me to serve on the invite committee for the annual Red & White Party in January. How time does fly! How much has happened since last January. When I was also on the invite committee, from which I learned to flog—and flog hard!—the event as early as possible. (See how clever I was, there? $30 a ticket or contact me! January 11–ping pong again!)

With my good friend and collaborator Kathryn Hamilton, I’ve developed two full productions (Dead Behind These Eyes and The Maids’ The Maids) and two work-in-progress showings (Make Like Its Yours and The Fall: A Performative Screening). With Chance, I’ve written a lengthy profile of Kenneth Collins and his transitional durational work My Voice Has an Echo In It (part of the 2015 PS 122 COIL Festival); completed research on zoe | juniper’s BeginAgain (also part of PS 122’s COIL Festival—I’ll be busy this January!); the aforementioned critical inquiry into the nature of authorship (you just have to read it) about Ich, Kürbisgeist. Four shows with Kathryn and Sister Sylvester. Two shows (Immersion and, opening last night, Lisa and Her Things) with Sans Comedia. I’m in discussion with my friend Steve Valk and his frequent collaborator Michael Klien about a forthcoming project in New York. I’ve written lengthy profiles and features on admirable artists like Mimi Lien (in American Theatre) and Dan Safer and Tony Torn (for Culturebot), whose fantastic Ubu Sings Ubu may well be coming back to NYC stages (if Facebook hints are to be properly analyzed and believed). And I watched Mallory Catlett—whose This Was the End blew me away on its opening weekend—sweep awards in the city for her and her collaborators’ brilliant work.

All things considered it’s been a fantastic—if troubling and problematic and everything else—year. And as November slips uncomfortably into December, the weather gyrating between pleasantly autumnal and brutishly cold, I’m looking back on time elapsed, another year older (and thereby closer to death, world death rates remaining constant at 100% despite best efforts), wiser (maybe?), happier (who knows?), but certainly more jaded.

Which was why it was nice to visit MoMA today. To be reminded of the very genuine experience of discovery and awe. When I first visited that lonely morning around 18 years ago, it had never occurred to me what it would mean to truly feel like I was a part of the world of the arts. I may not be super important, I may be stumbling (or fumbling, awkwardly) forward like everyone else I know in this field, but as much as I sometimes miss the feeling of what it was first like to be overwhelmed by art, I nevertheless am ecstatic to have wound up the little cog in the machine I now am.

 

Categories
Projects

Reviews of “The Maids’ The Maids” Are In

Photo by Maria Baranova
Photo by Maria Baranova

“Engaging and frustrating, imaginative and jumbled, original and derivative” –Alexis Soloski, The New York Times

“The refreshing result (half-documentary, half-Genet) is chaotic, but it’s also productive and genuinely subversive; Hamilton gives us the kind of mess you learn from making.” –Helen Shaw, TimeOut New York

“[A] dramatic seed blossoms late in the production when the otherwise goofy Isabel Sanchez delivers a sedating monologue on the real-life implications of the Papin sisters’ brutal act,” –Tara Sheena, Hyperallergic.com

“[A]s intentionally messy as the stage floor after the performers have spit Fritos all over it.” –Tom Sellar, the Village Voice

“To flood a small space with emotion is not an easy feat. I hope, upon entering the space, to see reflections of the artist’s emulated interests. I hope to enter into a place that is somewhat secret, forbidden, and where words and reason are non-essential. That space can be a memory, it can be triggered by the exclusivity of language, it can be a hotel room in LA, or a theater at Abrons Arts Center. But when those spaces collide, and when you realize that the unifying factor is the story of unheard stories, you know you’ve found something worth experiencing. And then you clean it off.” –Georgina Escobar, Culturebot

 

Categories
Projects

Sister Sylvester’s “The Maids’ The Maids” Opens Oct. 31

Sister Sylvester’s The Maids’ The Maids Opens Oct. 31

Photo by Maria Baranova
Photo by Maria Baranova

A note from the dramaturg:

I was just re-watching a video we shot in early summer during the first rehearsals we did for The Maids’ The Maids, (opening Oct. 31 at Abrons Arts Center; tickets $20). It was unpleasantly hot that day, and I’m wearing multiple layers of clothing—basically every shirt, light sweater, jacket, and hat we could find in the space, even a bright pink rain slicker. We’re working with a woman I’ll call Juana, one of our collaborators on the piece, and we’re having her teach us how to be one of her nicknames. She has several, it turns out, each referring to a different part of her life, and this one was “Rambo.” Even though I’m not an actor in the piece (I’m just the dramaturg), when she cast us in roles, she chose me to be Rambo, I guess because I was the only man in the room, or because she likes to flirt with me. (I got my own nickname during rehearsal: “El lechero,” the “milkman” who Genet’s maids lust after in his original play.)

I’m wearing all of these clothes because Rambo is the nickname Juana got while illegally crossing the border, and you’re dressed against the nighttime cold of the Nogales desert. I am quite warm though, and sweating under all those layers, as she has me scurrying back and forth in the rehearsal room, stopping every couple steps to yelp and tug at my pants. “Espinas!” she explains—thorns or cactus needles caught in your pants. You can’t stop to pull them out, so you try to keep the pants off the skin. Then we stop and drop into a crouch. It’s time to rest. The only food you have is in the front pockets of your clothes. There’s no light. You cross when there’s no moon. No cigarettes, no cell phones. Complete darkness and silence.

Categories
Blogging Life

Current Writings

http://vimeo.com/107398710

A lot of people may be under the impression I don’t do much writing anymore. In a sense that’s true, because I don’t blog as much. But I do have a fairly busy writing schedule. As one of the editors of Chance, I’m often slammed with beautiful and ambitious pieces. For instance, in the current issue, I have a lengthy profile on the work of Kenneth Collins of Temporary Distortion. It’s not online so you can only get it by purchasing a lovely, lovely copy of the magazine online or on newsstands around NYC.

I also have a feature in the current issue of American Theatre magazine, on the amazing scenic designer Mimi Lien. That one is online. We had a great chat, including this personal favorite bit:

“Okada described what he wants to do this way: ‘I don’t want to create the image onstage—I want it to be in the actor’s head, and find the most direct way to put that into the audience’s mind,’” Lien explains. “That may not involve creating that image onstage at all. It may actually be a combination of movement and text that creates what he calls a ‘richer image’ in the audience’s mind. What that meant to me is that I needed to create the most blank and neutral space possible. It was one of the hardest artistic design questions I’ve had to wrestle with.”

Categories
Projects

Publicity Photos from “Dead Behind These Eyes”

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Categories
Criticism

Appropriation and Representation, With Reference to the Wooster Group

The “Molotov Man,” 1979, by Susan Meiselas
The “Molotov Man,” 1979, by Susan Meiselas

Back in 2007, Harper’s magazine ran an article called “On the Rights of the Molotov Man” that I’ve always remembered. It’s about image culture, and specifically the fraught tale of a particular photograph, recounted through two separate essays: The first by artist Joy Garnett, the second by photographer Susan Meiselas.

Garnett explains how, in 2003, she was trying to find a way to critique the Bush administration’s militarism, and began searching the Internet for images of politically inspired violence, where, among others, she found one of a Molotov cocktail-throwing Sandanista. Later, she used this photograph as the basis of a painting, which was shown in a gallery in 2004. Predictably in this age of copyright conflict, the Magnum photography agency sent her something approaching a cease-and-desist, but which ultimately came down to two points: (1) that the original photographer should be credited, and (2) that permission would have to be sought for future uses. The latter piqued Garnett, who saw it as a sort of backdoor veto-power that would censor her, and she reached out to like-minded artists on Rhizome, ultimately (and accidentally) producing a wide-spread Internet-based protest movement in which the image was time and again re-appropriated by the protesting artistic community.

Her story, then, seems of a stereotypical kind with which we’re familiar these days: An artist working in mixed and new media adopts a found image to use as part of socially conscious protest artwork, and the intellectual property lawyers clamp down for unauthorized use. We live in a “re-mix” culture; Garnett is an artist of the “Poor Image” for whom the products of late-capitalist media culture serve as the raw material for artistic production; the entire idea of control of this image is a tragically ironic, defanging the very content it pretends to protect. And the political dimensions of this were not lost on the protesting artists. Here was an image of political protest, appropriated for another protest action, which in turn was being suppressed in the name of “intellectual property,” as though the photographer was the sole author of content, rather than the photo-journalistic subject and his political gesture.

Categories
Blogging Life

On Good Writing By Way of Remembering Lou Reed

20131029-201721

Since Lou Reed passed away Sunday, I feel like I’ve been reading nothing but remembrances, reminisces, and reassessments of his incredible artistic career, to say nothing of the various experiences friends and acquaintances had with the famously obstreperous man himself. (Is it me, or is that word coming up with strange frequency tied to his name? NB: It’s me; I Googled it. It comes up twice.)

For me, my abiding memory of Lou Reed will always be the time I saw him at the Kitchen, wearing New Balance sneakers and waiting near the bathroom for Laurie Anderson while holding her purse. It’s just such a human image, you know?

But I didn’t know Lou Reed, never said a word to him, and was in the same room as him maybe a half dozen times. I’m not part of Lou Reed’s orbit and though I’m sad to see him gone, I won’t belabor the nonexistent connection. What inspired me to write, actually, was returning to Lester Bangs’s legendary interviews with Reed, and in particular his famous 1973 interview for Let It Rock out of the UK. (You can read it here at the Guardian.)

Re-reading it today, I was struck by how in-the-moment it reads. Bangs isn’t necessarily one of the people we associate with New Journalism, but read it for yourself–it’s about as intense a narrative interview as you can get, from Bangs’s unsparing depiction of Reed’s self-destructive boozing to his willingness to put himself into the narrative, from recording his torture of the blitzed rocker after a mediocre show, to his own almost sentimental experience with a way-too-hip nine-year-old for a denouement.

My mind immediately went to Gay Talese’s legendary Esquire profile “Frank Sinatra Has a Cold,” which is easily one of the most revered magazine stories ever published. Talese was of course refined and arty in a way I doubt Bangs could stand; it’s like comparing Nelson Algren and Truman Capote. But both are such intense, sensory, and subtle experiences. The difference is that Talese reads like he spent weeks finessing the hell out of that piece, while Bangs’s reads like he spit it out in one rash take while that little brat at the end is bugging him.

Either way, I found myself reading some fantastic journalism today, which reminds of why I do what I do at the same time I find myself despairing that I’ll ever write something half as good as these brilliant pieces.